Especially in it's location, including after it's use of a water vessel then being the only location of food stores and resources for Noah and Co. this boat would not have survived the time. Christians don't believe in carbon dating. Also is all the specs right? That picture isn't of it for the simple fact that Mount Ararat is a frozen mountain! Flawed once again guys.

WOW I don´t know… but the possibility that the deluge was not a world event product of a desglaciation,with affecting surroundings of the black sea;the animals that occupied the ark were living in the region.

You've got to be kidding me… First of all the wood used in the Bible is 'Gopher Wood' which… doesn't name any wood we know of today, so there's no way to be sure that it's a different sort of wood at all. Second, Carbon Dating is… flawed. When you can take a sample of a living animal and have it come up as several MILLION years old then you have a flawed system… unless you want to say that the animal lives that long, which is preposterous. Third… this is old news. People have been claiming that they've found the remains of the ark on one mountain or another in the middle east for years… And finally, the 'dimensions' of the Ark could be (and probably are) much larger than what biblical scholars think. We don't really know how long a 'cubit' or a 'furlong' or whatever actually is, we can only speculate from evidence, and a lot of evidence suggests that we're wrong.