Roman Polanski held in custody

Academy Award-winning director Roman Polanski was finally held in custody for a crime he’s been accused of several decades ago. Polanski, who was trying to... More Below... Posted by on Sep 27th, 2009 and filed under Entertainment.

roman-polanski-in-wing-collarAcademy Award-winning director Roman Polanski was finally held in custody for a crime he’s been accused of several decades ago.

Polanski, who was trying to enter Switzerland on Saturday, was taken by the Swiss authorities. He was supposed to attend the Zurich Film Festival, which was holding a tribute to him. He was also nominated for best director Oscars for “Tess” and “Chinatown” and for best writing for “Rosemary’s Baby,” a film which he also directed.

Polanski was arrested due to a request by US authorities in connection with an arrest warrant from way back 1978.

In 1977, Polanski pleaded guilty to a single count of having unlawful sex with a 13-year old girl. He fled the US before he was given the sentence but was issued a warrant the next year.

Polanski took refuge in France and lived there ever since. In 2003, he won an Academy Award for Best Director for the film, “The Pianist.”

Categories: Entertainment
Tags:
  • Anon

    Question: If he pled guilty to the 'unlawful sex', how is it that he's 'accused' of the crime? He's pled guilty, which means he acknowledges he DID the crime. There's no 'accusation'. There is a crime that he acknowledged that he did, yet did not accept the penalty.

    And 'unlawful sex' seems to be a nice toned-down euphism for being a pedophile, given the girl in question, only 13 years of age at the time, was way below the age of consent… and given that drugs and alcohol were involved, consent probably couldn't have been given regardless.

  • Anon

    Question: If he pled guilty to the 'unlawful sex', how is it that he's 'accused' of the crime? He's pled guilty, which means he acknowledges he DID the crime. There's no 'accusation'. There is a crime that he acknowledged that he did, yet did not accept the penalty.

    And 'unlawful sex' seems to be a nice toned-down euphism for being a pedophile, given the girl in question, only 13 years of age at the time, was way below the age of consent… and given that drugs and alcohol were involved, consent probably couldn't have been given regardless.

  • Pingback: I’m Having Trouble Finding Sympathy For Roman… | Patrick Says

News & Journalism - Top Blogs Philippines